Paul's 'PGRI AI Labs': 'All Markets Are NOT Local'

click here to read PGRI AI Lab

One of the most persistent and intellectually unhelpful tropes in the lottery industry is the phrase, “All markets are local.” The statement appears whenever someone cites an innovation from another jurisdiction, describes a successful regulatory framework, points to a new approach to responsible gaming, or asks what one market might learn from another. Somebody always responds: “Our market is different.” The discussion ends. The lesson is dismissed. The opportunity to learn disappears.

Of course markets are different. Nobody needs to be reminded that Finland is not Florida, that Switzerland is not Texas, or that Canada is not Italy. Political systems differ. Regulatory structures differ. Cultures differ. Retail environments differ. But the focus on these differences has become often blinds us to a much more important reality: the forces shaping lottery markets are becoming increasingly universal. In fact, one might reasonably argue that government lottery is among the least local industries in the world. Operators throughout the world share remarkably similar missions, face remarkably similar challenges, and increasingly confront remarkably similar competitive pressures. Yet the industry sometimes behaves as though every market exists on its own island, disconnected from the experiences of everyone else. The result is a form of institutional exceptionalism. Every market believes its problems are unique. Every lottery believes its circumstances are special.

Every jurisdiction believes the experiences of others have limited relevance. The consequence is predictable: lessons go unlearned, mistakes get repeated, and opportunities are missed.

The Great Lottery Questions Are Universal Lottery operators everywhere are wrestling with the same questions. How do we compete against products with higher payout percentages? How do we modernize without becoming something we are not? How do we appeal to younger consumers while preserving public trust? How do we balance the focus on revenue generation with responsible gaming? How do we respond to sports betting, online casino gaming, prediction markets, and increasingly aggressive commercial competition? These questions now appear almost everywhere. The beneficiaries differ. The political systems differ. One lottery funds education while another funds sports or social programs. But the fundamental economic model remains remarkably consistent. Government lotteries exist to generate public benefit while maintaining social legitimacy. And that mission transcends geography, applying almost universally across the globe.

The interesting questions are not local. The interesting questions are universal.

The Myth of Market Exceptionalism The “all markets are local” trope frequently serves as a convenient excuse not to learn. A European operator describes the consequences of market liberalization. An American executive responds that Europe is different. Nordic countries discuss player registration. Someone explains why that would never work elsewhere. Canadian lotteries discuss responsible gaming. Others explain why their market is unique. The industry often behaves as though the existence of local differences somehow invalidates or at least mitigates the existence of common challenges. It does not. The opening of gambling markets to commercial competition and the normalization of sports betting and online casino-style gambling is not unique to Europe.

We can look for these to be happening in the U.S., probably sooner than later. Player registration may be more widely accepted in the Nordic countries for now. We can probably expect that to also change sooner than later. Questions surrounding responsible gaming, advertising restrictions, digital transformation, retailer modernization, and customer ownership manifest in quote similar ways throughout the world. What differs is not the issue. What differs is timing. Markets Move Through Similar Life Cycles One of the reasons learning from others even across the international stage matters is that industries typically move through similar life-cycles. Markets begin with monopoly conditions. Competition emerges. Regulation evolves. Technology changes consumer behavior.

New products appear. Political attitudes shift. Public scrutiny increases. Consumer expectations change. Etcetera. Europe may be several years ahead of the United States on certain issues. The Nordic countries may already be confronting questions as well as enjoying some benefits that other jurisdictions have barely begun to discuss. Some markets are earlier in their evolution, others more mature. This is precisely why studying other markets matters. The purpose is not to copy solutions. The purpose is to recognize trend lines, learn from mistakes as well as successes; sometimes even identify best-practices. Many of the issues confronting European lotteries over the past decade are very likely to confront American lotteries over the next decade. Synthetic lottery products such as Lottoland, online gaming expansion, market liberalization, player registration, channelization, responsible gaming standards, and increasing commercial competition all offer lessons. To ignore those experiences because “our market is different” is irresponsible. It is intellectual isolation.

Responsible Gaming Is Not Local Responsible gaming illustrates this perfectly. Government lotteries throughout the world increasingly find themselves held to standards that often exceed those applied to commercial operators. Lottery organizations invest heavily in moderation, player protection, and social responsibility, while higher-intensity products sometimes operate under very different expectations. The specific regulations differ. The underlying issue does not.

How should governments balance consumer freedom with public health concerns? Should products with similar characteristics operate under similar standards? How should responsible gaming obligations be distributed? These questions now appear almost everywhere. The RTP Problem Is Universal Commercial gaming frequently offers substantially higher payout percentages than lottery. Sports betting, online casino gaming, and many digital products can deliver greater immediate economic value to consumers. If payout percentages alone determined consumer behavior, lotteries everywhere would be in trouble. But consumers repeatedly demonstrate that they value more than expected financial return. They value trust, legitimacy, social acceptance, public benefit, dreams, simplicity, and moderation. The challenge facing lottery operators throughout the world is not how to outcompete commercial gaming on RTP. It is how to strengthen and communicate the broader attributes that make lottery distinctive.

The specific ways that lotteries address that issue will differ throughout the world. But the challenge is the same and it would be myopic to think we can’t learn from each other. The Best-Practices Paradox It is unfortunate that in spite of our commonalities, in spite of the countless ways in which the issues manifest in similar ways throughout the world, the notion of “best- practices” is dismissed because “all markets are local”. It’s true that if all markets are truly local, then best-practices do not really exist. Conferences become social gatherings. International study tours become tourism. Interviews become entertainment. Comparative research becomes irrelevant. Thankfully, nobody actually believes that. The reason executives travel internationally, attend conferences, conduct interviews, and study other jurisdictions is because they intuitively understand that markets do in fact share far more than they differ.

The purpose is not imitation. The purpose is learning. What problems are emerging elsewhere? What mistakes have others already made? Which strategies succeeded? Which failed? Which trends appear temporary or in fact “local”, and which appear structural? Those are the rubber-hits-road questions that need to be addressed. The More Interesting Conversation Local conditions matter. They always will. But an over-focus on our differences often prevents us from seeing the larger story, and learning from it. Government lotteries throughout the world increasingly face greater competition, greater scrutiny, digital transformation, changing consumer behavior, political pressure, responsible gaming expectations, and the need to articulate a value proposition that extends beyond prize payout. These forces do not stop at jurisdictional lines.

The future of lottery may prove to be far less local than we might imagine. The operators that learn most effectively from one another will likely discover that their common challenges are much larger than their differences. Perhaps the more intelligent question is not “How is my market different?” but instead “Who has already experienced the future that is about to arrive in mine?” Because the real danger of the “all markets are local” trope is not that it is entirely wrong. It is that it invites us to stop asking questions just when we should be asking more of them.